In a routine. Stay in the routine. Get out of your routine. I’m surprised as how a routine has formed here in Kathmandu; I shouldn’t be, of course, but I am. I wake up, eat a banana pancake, drink my masala tea while I read The Kathmandu Post or The Himalayan, and then I’m off to the office. The surprising thing, though, is that this routine isn’t bad-far from it. I work in an office everyday where work begins with an hour’s worth of meditation, where shoes aren’t allowed but meals are provided, where conversation and conscious are as important as carbon copies. The people here, and Indira especially, are so driven. Working with them, side by side, elbow to elbow, neck deep in the trenches of discrimination, of backwardness, of taboo and stigma, is one of the most amazing experiences of my life; it’s something I’ll always treasure, and I’m sure it will leave a lasting influence, tinting my progressive glasses just a bit more.
In what was a break of the routine, though, we went to Pharping Monastery yesterday to pick up Liz; she had spent the last week staying at the guest house and interviewing Buddhist nuns. We visited both the nunnery (their words, not mine) and the monastery, where we witnessed part of an ancient ritual. At least two dozen young (12 or younger) monks sat and recited Tibetan verses to drum beat and horn blast. Each bobbed back and forth, heads moving to chest and back, pleading for world peace. Tibetan Buddhism remains itself a unique entity; there are gods; there are demons; there are a thousand who have reached enlightenment, but millions more who have returned to the world, reincarnated once more into the world of suffering. There is the exception, the Bodhisattva- the one who has achieved enlightenment but, because of such great love for humanity, returns to the world to assist others in their pursuit of enlightenment. In fact, this is, in some cases, considered the ideal towards which a Buddhist should strive.
I was, once more, very affected, especially by the peace of the whole place. Just like the Benedictines, the Buddhists know how to pick a spot. The hills in the distance each day are slowly swallowed by the swilling clouds. The monastery is positioned on a hill-top with the terraced plains covering the ground below. So great was my experience that I have decided to stay at the monastery for a time (3 July-15 July) instead of going with the group to Pokhara. One of the main appeals if I demand utmost honesty of myself is the individualization of the time; I cannot remember the last time I took days to myself, days to read, to write, to think, to be. There are a number of hills surrounding the monastery, and each one demands its own climb.
And now, for something completely different, as simply recapping my adventures will bore all of you, dear readers, to tears before I can actually make any real point, so I’ll try to use this medium, amplifying my voice by at least ten-fold, to do that very thing. I was thinking today about love. Oh love- to figure out what you are, dearest of virtues, sweetest of vices, is a pursuit which remains always unending. I was reminded of something I wrote once, and I’m still shocked by its quality. Love always prevails. It’s what holds us together, and it’s what tears us apart. It’s the strongest and weakest of forces. We are love. To be human is to exemplify love, and as such-god. Romantic that I am, I believe, above all things, except in the goodness of French fries dipped in a frosty and rock n’ roll, in love, both romantic and plutonic. Poetry aside, though, I think that love, however little it may be, makes us and keeps us human. It either holds us or pulls us back from the edge. I was reading Emmanuel Levinas’ work Humanism of the Other last week and came across this line: “…the impossibility of canceling responsibility for the other, impossibility more impossible than jumping out of one’s skin, the imprescriptible duty surpassing the forces of being. A duty that did not ask for consent, that came into me traumatically, from beneath all re-memorable present, anarchically without beginning.” Bound before birth, each of us is uniquely connected to the human beings around us in the world, and it remains, without reward or completion, to attempt, for we never can fully understand, to understand the needs and desires, the wants and cares, the being of those with us. That, perhaps, is a more philosophical description of what I’m trying to reach with my initial stipulations. Love is that very desire that constantly drives us towards other human beings even though we know distance will always remains. It demands that we continue to push ourselves closer and closer, removing inch by inch as much of that distance as we can, but we can never remove all of it; we can never, as much as we might wish, put ourselves in the other person’s place.
On one more different note in this post that is already far to disorganized to be qualified as one whole blog post, I’ll post the speech that was given (that, for the most part, I prepared) at the workshop last Sunday:
In a routine. Stay in the routine. Get out of your routine. I’m surprised as how a routine has formed here in Kathmandu; I shouldn’t be, of course, but I am. I wake up, eat a banana pancake, drink my masala tea while I read The Kathmandu Post or The Himalayan, and then I’m off to the office. The surprising thing, though, is that this routine isn’t bad-far from it. I work in an office everyday where work begins with an hour’s worth of meditation, where shoes aren’t allowed but meals are provided, where conversation and conscious are as important as carbon copies. The people here, and Indira especially, are so driven. Working with them, side by side, elbow to elbow, neck deep in the trenches of discrimination, of backwardness, of taboo and stigma, is one of the most amazing experiences of my life; it’s something I’ll always treasure, and I’m sure it will leave a lasting influence, tinting my progressive glasses just a bit more.
In what was a break of the routine, though, we went to Pharping Monastery yesterday to pick up Liz; she had spent the last week staying at the guest house and interviewing Buddhist nuns. We visited both the nunnery (their words, not mine) and the monastery, where we witnessed part of an ancient ritual. At least two dozen young (12 or younger) monks sat and recited Tibetan verses to drum beat and horn blast. Each bobbed back and forth, heads moving to chest and back, pleading for world peace. Tibetan Buddhism remains itself a unique entity; there are gods; there are demons; there are a thousand who have reached enlightenment, but millions more who have returned to the world, reincarnated once more into the world of suffering. There is the exception, the Bodhisattva- the one who has achieved enlightenment but, because of such great love for humanity, returns to the world to assist others in their pursuit of enlightenment. In fact, this is, in some cases, considered the ideal towards which a Buddhist should strive.
I was, once more, very affected, especially by the peace of the whole place. Just like the Benedictines, the Buddhists know how to pick a spot. The hills in the distance each day are slowly swallowed by the swilling clouds. The monastery is positioned on a hill-top with the terraced plains covering the ground below. So great was my experience that I have decided to stay at the monastery for a time (3 July-15 July) instead of going with the group to Pokhara. One of the main appeals if I demand utmost honesty of myself is the individualization of the time; I cannot remember the last time I took days to myself, days to read, to write, to think, to be. There are a number of hills surrounding the monastery, and each one demands its own climb.
And now, for something completely different, as simply recapping my adventures will bore all of you, dear readers, to tears before I can actually make any real point, so I’ll try to use this medium, amplifying my voice by at least ten-fold, to do that very thing. I was thinking today about love. Oh love- to figure out what you are, dearest of virtues, sweetest of vices, is a pursuit which remains always unending. I was reminded of something I wrote once, and I’m still shocked by its quality. Love always prevails. It’s what holds us together, and it’s what tears us apart. It’s the strongest and weakest of forces. We are love. To be human is to exemplify love, and as such-god. Romantic that I am, I believe, above all things, except in the goodness of French fries dipped in a frosty, in love, both romantic and plutonic. Poetry aside, though, I think that love, however little it may be, makes us and keeps us human. It either holds us or pulls us back from the edge. I was reading Emmanuel Levinas’ work Humanism of the Other last week and came across this line: “…the impossibility of canceling responsibility for the other, impossibility more impossible than jumping out of one’s skin, the imprescriptible duty surpassing the forces of being. A duty that did not ask for consent, that came into me traumatically, from beneath all re-memorable present, anarchically without beginning.” Bound before birth, each of us is uniquely connected to the human beings around us in the world, and it remains, without reward or completion, to attempt, for we never can fully understand, to understand the needs and desires, the wants and cares, the being of those with us. That, perhaps, is a more philosophical description of what I’m trying to reach with my initial stipulations. Love is that very desire that constantly drives us towards other human beings even though we know distance will always remains. It demands that we continue to push ourselves closer and closer, removing inch by inch as much of that distance as we can, but we can never remove all of it; we can never, as much as we might wish, put ourselves in the other person’s place.
Welcome Note (National Workshops on Sexuality)
· Indira Shrestha (With assistance from Corbin Cleary)
· 20 June 2010
On behalf of the entire Shtrii Shakti Family including myself, a very wamr welcome to all of you special people on a one to one basis!
Thank you very much for attending our conference today regarding women’s sexuality and empowerment. As many of you are aware, Shtrii Shakti since its inception has been driven towards furthering women’s empowerment. Shtrii Shakti was established in 1991 as a women-led national development institution working at all levels-local/grassroots to international. S2 is an inclusive development institution that works towards empowerment of excluded communities, especially women and youth, based on informed action.
Shtrii Shakti works with a holistic view-out to reach not just the head but also the heart or the spiritual centre, not just thinking but also feeling of a person. In other words this institution is guided by the principle of the 3 E’s-energy, emotion, and esteem. 1. Energy, as in physical energy and vitality, a powerful physical force. 2. Emotional Energy, a powerful creative force. 3. Esteem or positive thinking as life directing force.
Today’s conference represents another new step in the direction of our holistic approach to addressing or looking at an issue of importance as it examines the link between sexuality and women’s empowerment.
Despite the many advances made with regard to women’s empowerment in Nepal, including in the economic, political, and reproductive health sectors, our movement has failed until now to recognize the importance of women’s sexuality to the continued empowerment of women, and it is a failure which remains, until resolved, highly delimiting.
Before continuing though, we must attempt to understand what is meant by sexuality. First and foremost, our sexuality is tied up most intimately and essentially with our humanity. Not one of us can be a human being without possessing sexuality, nor can anyone of possess sexuality without being a human being. As such, for every person here, our sexuality remains something that is in each case unique and individual to our very own selves. Though no universal definition of sexuality exists and no dictionary definition proves sufficient, to provide for a working terminology, let us turn towards the one provided by the World Health Organization, which defines sexuality as, “The central aspect of being human, encompassing sex, gender identities/roles, sexual orientation, eroticism, pleasure, intimacy, and reproduction.”
Even in accepting the W.H.O. definition, a variety of perceptions exist regarding sexuality. The first of these is the anthropological perspective which remains closely aligned with social constructionist theory. These perspectives regard sexuality as primarily a social construct; everything from our actions to our behaviors, from our roles to our desires has been determined and set by the demands and dictates of society. The whole structure of society, including economic and cultural elements, is directly responsible for producing what has become the accepted norm of sexuality.
Moving in a similar vein to this structuralist approach is the feminist perspective. This perspective finds women’s sexuality as something that established within a society already disposed to differences in power based upon gender. The men who possess the power within the patriarchy define sexuality for women. They establish what is acceptable and what is not, what is clean and what is dirty, and what is pure and what is tainted.
Differing from these approaches is the biomedical perspective, and in this perspective sexuality is reduced simply to a combination of hormones and organs. It expands naturally from the right combinations of hormones interacting with the proper cells found in organs in just the proper placement. From this cellular construct spawned the difference in sexuality between men and women.
Older than all these, and until only recently somewhat unexamined, is the mythological approach. Prior to the studies of sociology and psychology, human beings operated within their societies according to the established myths, legends, and tales which both encouraged and condemned specific behaviors, champion and damning legendary heroes and villains as either exemplifiers of virtue or vice.
While each of these perspectives offers some understanding towards a unified theory of sexuality, not one is complete within itself. Sexuality rather is something that should be seen as a combination of biology and society, of myth and of power, and women’s sexuality in Nepal serves as a perfect example.
As our research has shown, women in Nepal have been so exposed to systemic patriarchy that it has become ingrained into their very own selves. A woman’s being remains consistently and constantly controlled by a society which defines them as subservient, as less than their male counterparts. The consequences of this ever-present patriarchy manifest themselves in the responses gathered in our initial surveys. Women were, for the most part, unaware of their own rights as human beings, especially with regard to sexuality and reproductive health. Patriarchy drives women into silence and hesistance in open discussion regarding their own sexuality and discourages further learning, both about their own sexuality and sexual health generally. This further leads to misunderstandings and misconceptions of sexual biology and in particular to the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases, most worrisome of which is HIV/AIDS. In doing this, society is attempting to separate the woman from her sexuality, delegating her to no more than something to be objectified.
What is needed now for the continued empowerment of the women of Nepal is an attitude shift regarding their own sexuality, but this shift can only be brought about when the women of Nepal are no longer ignorant or ashamed of their sexuality. By bringing them into open discussion, women can begin to recognize the value of their unique sexuality, elevating their self-esteem.
The contradictions and ambivalences in our society regarding women’s sexuality are almost overpowering. In our myths and legends, we are goddesses and creative forces, the divine mother and the source of life; we are uniquely tied to the creation and the perpetuation of the universe. Thinking of women’s sexuality while mindful of our historico-cultural and spiritual background, the patriarchal assertions seem a travesty at best. What creates life it calls unclean; what carries life it calls impure. Patriarchy attempts to drive our sexualities into the darkness, demeaning us as human beings. It places demands upon women to hide our sexuality while men abound with their libertine licentiousness.
Changing attitudes remains far from easy. It is indeed a challenge. Before we can even egin this task, we must create safe spaces for women to speak openly, honestly, and loudly about their sexuality. Only then can we move on to recognizing the patriarchy inherent in women’s sexualities and begin to remove its painful stain.
We must work with women to defeat the destructive elements of patriarchy which have become so internalized into our own sexuality. For too long women have regarded their sexuality as something to be hidden, as something that is not their own but rather belongs to their husbands and to their families or society at large. By allowing for open and honest discussions of this much contested issue, we are creating for women the opportunity and space to reclaim their right to be.
In an attempt to begin this conversation and the resulting shift in attitude regarding sexuality, Shtrii Shakti has initiated this action research since 2007 to date. This has been made possible with the assistance of the Ford Foundation and UNFPA. Shtrii Shakti would like to extend deep appreciation and gratitude to the Ford Foundation and UNFPA, especially Ms. Ugochi Daniels, Deputy Representative, and Ms. Roshami Goswami, the focal person for this study from the Ford Foundation.
As our conference continues this evening, my hope is that you will see the value in this conversation regarding women’s sexuality and empowerment. Thank you very much for your attendance here today, and let us all begin to make an impactful difference in breaking the silence and stigma associated with the issue of sexuality.
Thank you.